Bronica 110mm F4.5 PS Macro Review
One of the things I quickly got frustrated with when taking pictures with my Bronica SQ-A was focusing distances. Neither the 80mm nor 150mm lenses I owned allowed me to get that close to a subject which is why I bought the extension tube I wrote about previously here. Bronica did make a 110mm F4.0 macro lens in both S and PS form, which is the most commonly known about, but these were not true macro lenses. Only producing a reproduction ratio of 1:4 and not a true 1:1 (the latter meaning the subject is produced as large on the film or sensor as it is in real life). However late in the life of the SQ, Bronica released a 110mm F4.5 PS Macro lens that was capable of 1:1 and stands alone as being the only lens ever released in 6x6 medium format (across any manufacturer) to achieve this. Unsurprisingly this makes the lens not only very desirable but also very rare, with little information or sample photos available for those who are curious. Hopefully this blog will shed a bit more light on this unusual item.
To test this lens, I shot five rolls of Fuji Pro400H in various different conditions, both macro and non-macro to see how it also stacks up as a general-purpose lens. It does sit nicely in between my 80mm and 150mm lenses and is roughly equivalent to a 60mm macro in full frame (35mm) terms. Though the difference in length between this and 80mm is noticeable I rarely felt overly constrained when using it in similar situations, though it does help being outdoors where you often have more space to move back.
Immediately when using it I could see how much heavier it is in comparison to the lenses I already had. Typically, the later PS lenses are generally heavier than the older S lenses as they have updated designs, sometimes with more groups and elements, but this was doubly so in order to produce the 1:1 ratio required for true macro. Though I have never held the earlier F4 version in my hand I can see from photos that even the PS version is much smaller. This lens also extended a lot further and when you do focus in to 1:1 the lens protrudes about 50% further than at infinity focus. To compare the two, his has a minimum focusing distance of 37cm as opposed to 66cm for the F4 macro lenses.
Originally all Bronica prime lenses were made (with the odd exception for the vary longest and widest) with a 67mm filter thread. This was done for consistency so working professionals didn’t have to carry a huge set of filters. Though this lens is one of the exceptions where, in order to improve the design sufficiently, they had to to a larger 72mm filter thread (as well as the slightly smaller maximum aperture). One thing I have found to be a bit of a nuisance, is that I am struggling to use the focusing aids accurately in my waist-level finder (WLF). I don’t know whether it is because it is an F4.5 lens as opposed to F2.8 or F3.5 which my 80mm and 150mm lenses are respectively, but the lower half of the middle circle is often dark and the surrounding microprisms seem to do very little as well. That has caused me to misfocus at times. Perhaps it is also due to the complex nature of a true macro lenses’ glass elements and groupings. The focusing ring is also much stiffer than my other lenses but then it does have a lot more glass to move. I’m sure I will improve in using it with time, but it can be quite unforgiving.
When you do get it right however, the results are spectacular. From what I’ve seen online there is a big difference between the S and PS lenses in terms of colour and sharpness due to improved design as well as better coatings. That was immediately evident here. My 80mm and 150mm S lenses give the typical washed out look that people often think about with film, whereas this lens has much more vibrant colours and contrast. These were the results I’d been trying to achieve with my Bronica since I’d owned it, so I was excited when I saw the converted images on my computer. If these are the results with colour negative film then I am even more excited to see what it is like shooting slide film with its even greater colour & detail. It’s worth mentioning that I do edit my photos slightly so the colours you see are not straight out of the box, but they are not far off.
As with other macro lenses and extension tubes it is officially recommended to increase your exposure as you get closer to your subject. However, like with my S-36 Extension tube I didn’t see any problems with not increasing the exposure. Perhaps the latitude of colour negative film is wide enough to get around it and that it may be more of an issue for slide film with its more precise requirements for exposure. Rest assured I will report back my findings on this blog when I have done so.
Overall, I am thrilled to have been able to own and use one of these lenses. It is one I have been dreaming about for a while and it felt a bit surreal when I first held it in my hands. It’s a lens I will certainly look after and hopefully use for years to come. It’s also got me thinking that I should upgrade my other lenses to their PS versions as well. If you are lucky enough to have this lens in your possession, then I certainly encourage you to make the most of it. If you are looking to buy one then be aware then you may need to be a little patient as they rarely come up for sale, but hopefully you can agree the results will be worth the wait. Especially when this lens can do things that nothing else can in this format.
If you enjoyed this blog then please consider leaving a tip below.